Post by Nacky on Oct 14, 2010 21:53:05 GMT -5
The mistake here is assuming that energy affects mass. Energy IS Mass unfrozen. The interval ratio is energy is equal to mass times the speed of light squared. In other words E-mc^2 or the point I told you about, that is the the basic quantized ratio.
Um, I didn't assume that, but isn't the wind a type of energy? When wind hits a windmill, which is mass, doesn't it turn? I guess I'll have to rethink that. I'm not very good with physics.
A few things of gentle note. Ley Lines are physical objects. They are mapped. If they are mapped, then they were traveled to be measured. That is a physical process.
I was referring to the energy that flows inside the Ley lines. Sorry for any confusion. I just chock it up to the energy from the magnetic North & South poles and all points between them. But again, what do I know?
Energy from other dimensions is as real as the Casimir Effect and virtual particles. That is where those physical phenomena come from.
That is why I suggested that the trails of where we've been are still obtainable in quite another aspect.
Energy is not man made. It already and simply is. What Humans do is use it in some fashion.
Right.
How so? There are millions upon millions of electrons in the smallest part of foamed space-time, yet each of these leptons is identical in property to the other electrons. It is only when leptons and hadrons interchange bosons that the differentiation we call elements at the atomic scale becomes perceptible.
I meant pathways inside the Ley lines only. Not the physical ones.
Gravitation is not the same as electromagnetism. For one thing, gravity's particle, the poorly understood graviton, has a predicted whole integer spin of 2 while the electron has a 1/2 integer spin. The graviton we expect to be a monopole that attracts or repels, while the electron as a dipole that attracts and repels.
I was referring to the beginning and end of the entire network of the Ley lines. Not the gravity of earth in general. I keep forgetting to explain that, so sorry about that.
Time if I may point out is not linear.
That's exactly what I was saying. Hey!
Time is volumetric and expands or contracts depending on how much energy you freeze the "faster" you go in one direction or unfreeze the slower you go into the other direction. Counter-intuitively the interval shrinks the faster you go and expands the slower you go.
Exotic matter is also said to be able to produce wormholes even upon terra firma. So wherever there's light, it may be possible. But hey, I didn't come up with that so you'll have to thwamp the original author of that idea, heh heh.
Not quite correct I must point out . Space is elastic and light does travel "backwards" as it leaves an event trail in space or we could not see an object even ten meters away . It has to be able of this. Bell Theorem remember? We look into the PAST when we look however far we look into the distance.
Not correct? I said the same thing about space and light being able to travel backwards, and I even said that a "trail" would exist. I just called it a "record" is all, like a record of events as imprinted in space/time. I never said anything that knocked what you say above, I was in fact saying the same thing only not as elaborate as you put it. *nervous laugh*
One more comment: an event horizon is a limit or physical boundary. It is not energy. It is not matter. it is a border where the absolute energy limits of our space time take hold and we cannot see past or through the border though information can enter it...just not leave.
Er, um I don't think I said that an event horizon was enegy per sé, if it came out that way that's not what I meant. I just said it was a linear frame of time for reference. Our known reference. But I'm sure I messed up my words. English is hard! Whew
They are clearly (3)+1/-1 discrete objects. I can map them. That means to me that they are confined to this space-time.
Well I meant the energy produced by them, not the physical lines. And you cannot go underneath the oceans and crust so easily LOL! Well I'm just saying you'd need some really awesome vehicle if you were to do that. *nervous laugh again*
Again I am not qualified to discuss the spiritual aspects of Ley Line travel. I am however confident that the mapped physical lines are of and limited to this universe since they do NOT exhibit characteristics that I would instantly recognize for an extra-dimensional object.
Ah, but we don't look through eyes that can detect all aspects and vibrations of the spectrum. That's what I meant. Sorry I didn't explain myself better. The energy produced by the Ley lines are probably not extra-dimensional but they contain properties or energies that cannot be detected by human means. Unless we genetically alter ourselves in some way,
.
That is an extra-dimensional object believe it or not.
That is an extra-dimensional object believe it or not.
Very cool! Did you ever see the one that used a type of spider's web as a point of reference? Pretty cool.
The Klein bottle will not hold a drink.
Well it was just a joke. Heh heh. Sorry about that.
Information does not have to be a construct. It can be as simple as modulated space-time.
Yep!
No, I'm afraid not. That violates causality and entropy.
Again, I was referring to the application of exotic matter in a part of space that isn't our own in this timeframe or placement.
Conservation of information, even in matters of spiritual travel is fundamental to organized information theory. As long as you are a coherent observer, you cannot violate causality or entropy, not as long as TIME is present in your ordinate system. .
Organized information theory? You mean like the perfect reflective filters as say the Rings of Saturn? Or are we talking about space? I'm thinking in astronomical terms so I'm probably not following you.
The Wiki article is wrong about gravity and anti-matter. As of 2004, Fermi Lab was able to show that anti-protons have the same gravitational tractor effect as standard protons.
Yeah but it is Wikipedia, after all.
Again a violation of causality.
Well they used to say that going into space was a violation of gravity, a basic physic element. I dunno. I guess my whole outlook on time travel sucks anyway. I really don't know. It was just a theory and based on what I know and hey, I never went to any of those universities and so who's gonna listen to me, anyway?
I mean, it's not like one can change the course of history if one went back, because there wouldn't be a single person therewith. If one took a team, that team would be on the same mission and that doesn't count. They're travelling too. So nobody could recall or remember the traveller(s) because it simply wasn't history. It's just a duplicate of that time, mass, matter, what have you. So you wouldn't have to worry about something turning out different and coming back to find that you weren't even born or some other indirect actions of tumbling through time.
Besides I don't conform to any one paradigm of thinking when it comes to science. Because it's flawed and wonderfully open to new discoveries.
Well, I guess I should get back to what I know and leave the physics alone. I've got to finish some sewing and cleaning. Enjoy your evening!